At a time when many water utilities are caught in the squeeze between lower capital budgets and the need for higher plant capacity, the City of Penticton, BC, nearly doubled the water treatment plant’s peak production with an advanced clarification technology. The retrofit achieved the highest benefit-to-cost ratio at lowest life cycle cost and should meet the projected water demand for the next half century without infrastructure improvements.
Penticton is a resort destination with significantly higher summer population than the 35,000 normally served by 9000 connections. The potential problem emerged in 2003 at the water plant when demand during that exceptionally hot and dry summer reached 55 ML/d (million liters per day) of the facility’s 60 ML/d capacity.
“With our original clarification process, we were at capacity,” said Brent Edge, Penticton Water Quality Supervisor.
This capacity issue arose while lingering hydraulic deficiencies existed in the drinking water distribution system and discharges of clarifier and filter backwash sludge into the sewer system sludge were eroding the capacity of the WWTP and subsequently damaging the creek environment due to its discharge water quality.
Estimates to correct these incremental shortcomings with individual projects exceeded the city’s financing capabilities. This led the municipality to contract with the Vancouver office of AECOM to study the overall situation and to develop a comprehensive -- and more affordable — solution to improve the existing infrastructure.
“The consolidation of engineering and project management responsibilities with one firm not only saved in design but likely contractor fees,” Edge said. “AECOM worked closely with the city’s engineering and operations staff to develop five conceptual retrofits — complete with capital and life-cycle operating cost estimates -- that would add the needed capacity and resolve other operational issues.”
The conceptual designs were based on one of three raw water sources or combinations thereof that would deliver more than the maximum 60 ML/d of the existing Okanagan Lake pump station and dedicated water main, Edge added. In addition to the high-quality water from Okanagan Lake, the alternative sources included a similar water quality from the city well or Penticton Creek that presented seasonal quality, and therefore, chemical treatment issues. However, all of these raw water sources were sufficient to ensure a long-term supply whose life-cycle costs were affected by their different characteristics.