About the author:
Patrick Foley is a systems engineer for Orenco Systems Inc. Foley can be reached at [email protected]. Mike Saunders is market segment leader of engineered systems for Orenco Systems Inc. Saunders can be reached
at [email protected].
Patrick Foley & Mike Saunders
undefined
About 90 miles east of Columbus, Ohio, lies the village of Lore City, incorporated in 1906. Sewage collection and treatment in the village was historically handled by onsite septic tanks and drain fields. Unfortunately, as those systems aged and began to fail, the village was increasingly plagued with unpleasant odors.
In 2011, the village council hired URS Corp., an engineering and construction firm, to provide the municipality with a sewer solution for its community of a little more than 300 people. The village had secured a loan from the Ohio Water Development Authority (OWDA) for the design work. Because loan payments were scheduled to begin shortly after the funding was distributed, residents began paying a monthly sewer bill during the design phase of the sewer.
In 2012, URS presented its design for a gravity sewer followed by a package treatment plant. Unfortunately, the engineer had underestimated the construction costs, and during the first round of project bidding, no bids were received because the engineer’s cost estimate was too low.
Not Once, but Twice
URS reintroduced the project with a higher engineer’s estimate and received two bids that both exceeded the estimate by more than $200,000. Additionally, while the bids received were both higher than the engineering estimate, the estimate was also higher than the amount of funding available. The ramifications were not good for anyone involved. Residents had been paying a monthly sewer bill for nearly two years and yet the project was now at a complete standstill. The community was left with no sewer infrastructure and a monthly loan payment to OWDA for design work that had gotten the village nowhere.
After the second attempt to bid the project failed, the URS project manager passed the information on to personnel at OWDA and the Ohio EPA because both agencies had committed to funding the project. These personnel were familiar with Orenco’s work in other parts of the state and recommended that URS contact Orenco for possible solutions.
Effluent Sewer Savings
Orenco offered a sewer solution that would meet the city’s budget, which was an effluent sewer for wastewater collection followed by an AdvanTex AX-MaxTM wastewater treatment facility. Because of the first two failed proposals, the URS engineer was hesitant to make a third, but research revealed the septic tank effluent pump (STEP) collection system used in this sewer would provide a significant cost savings over the gravity sewer specified in the first two proposals.
These effluent sewers can be installed with less-intrusive construction methods than gravity sewers, which reduces a number of byproducts of the construction process, including adverse environmental impacts, permitting concerns, problems with handling and disposing of excavated soils and groundwater, the number and cost of utility conflicts and resulting relocations, and the high cost of surface restoration.
Also, effluent sewers experience minimal infiltration and inflow throughout the collection system because service laterals and mainlines are pressurized, mains are shallowly buried, and manholes are not needed.