The Triton aerator/mixer's more efficient oxygen transfer and mixing capabilities result in energy savings.Click here to enlarge imageBubble size is one of the components that determines alpha factor along with surfactants, turbulence, power input per unit volume (hp/MG), tank geometry and degree of treatment. Here we will concentrate on the significance of bubble size.
The Triton process aerator/mixer breaks the bubbles into a 2 mm bubble size, which is defined by EPA as "fine bubble." Breaking up a one inch diameter bubble into a fine bubble increases the total surface area from 3.14 square inches to more than 39 square inches. The fine bubbles also have a longer hang time. Increasing surface area and creating longer hang times mean more oxygen transfer.
The technology also produces a horizontal and circular flow pattern, providing whole basin circulation. Its dual props create a high velocity horizontal stream of oxygen that sweeps solids along with it, keeping them in suspension for more efficient biological treatment. This dispersion of oxygen throughout the basin results in more efficient wastewater treatment and higher removal rates of Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD) and suspended solids.
The aerator/mixers are typically placed to create a "flow linkage" between units. This keeps solids in suspension to be treated by the uniform DO (dissolved oxygen) levels. The ability to maintain desired velocities and oxygen dispersion of any size basin through horsepower and linkage ensures energy consumption for aeration and mixing only. It also helps prevents treatment problems such as short-circuiting and dead zones.
The aerators can be turned on and off to match the demand of the system (turn-down capability) to meet fluctuating hydraulic flows or loadings in the wastewater, resulting in additional energy savings.
Electrical SavingsWith the Triton system's high oxygen dispersion/mixing rates and more effective treatment removal rates, fewer units are required to meet a facility's standards. Electrical savings for operational costs can be calculated by a formula where:
kW x $/kW/hr x hr of operation = operating costs.
For example, a recent application installed a 100 hp Triton System in place of 225 hp of another aeration technology. Thus, a 125 hp savings in operational equipment means:
The result was a $49,012 savings in one year, or a $245,061 savings over 5 years.
Case StudiesA municipality need not replace an entire system to realize significant electrical savings. The following examples demonstrate the impact of upgrading aging equipment in existing systems with Triton aerator/mixers.