Du Quoin’s circular basin digesters were originally two clarifiers that served the old trickling filter plant.
Click here to enlarge imageThe facility is currently receiving a little over half of the original design load and consuming about 20% less power than originally projected for this level of loading. Consequently, as the plant reaches design conditions the system will save the City of Du Quoin approximately $30,000 per year in power bills.
When it comes to energy efficiency, the Schreiber digesters are performing well. The city operates two 200,000 gallon digesters and the mixing for each of these units is supplied by only one 2 hp motor for each basin. Staff had become increasingly curious about how much of the plant’s energy efficiency could be attributed to these “energy-miser” digesters. Unfortunately, the plant has only one power meter for the entire facility, therefore measuring the power consumed only by the digesters was not possible without considerable expenditures for power sub-metering.
However, after giving the matter some thought, staff decided that they might be able to get a handle on the digesters’ energy usage by employing a “comparative facility” approach to the issue.
Chester, IL, is located near Du Quoin and operates a wastewater treatment facility that is an ideal candidate for a comparative study. The wastewater treatment facility at Chester is very similar in equipment type and size. In fact, the equipment components installed in the two plants are identical – except for their digesters – which are of a different type and brand. The Du Quoin and Chester digesters also experience similar solids loading characteristics. The Chester plant digesters usually experience solids of around 4%, while Du Quoin typically maintains a solids content of about 4.5%. Also, both plants experience occasional excursions of up to a maximum of 6% solids.
Although the Chester plant is rated as a 3 mgd plant and Du Quoin was designed for a 2.4 mgd load, the two plants are each handling a current average load of around 1.5 mgd. (Chester at 1.6 and Du Quoin at 1.4).
When the power usage numbers for the two plants were compared over a 12-month period, it was found that the Chester plant consumed, on a monthly basis, roughly 102,000 KWH per mgd of influent compare with Du Quoin’s 51,000 KWH per mgd per month. The resulting difference in the average monthly power usage should be attributable to the difference in digesters, since the two plants are otherwise very comparable.